Duvall Earthquake, May 2 9:04pm PDT, Cross-sections and Map View

Duvall Earthquake, May 2 9:04pm PDT

UPDATED 6/28/96 Provided by: Ruth Ludwin, Seismology Lab
Geophysics Program, Box 351650
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98195

Best-quality locations for Duvall Sequence

The Duvall Mainshock (5/2/96) and 368 aftershocks were relocated using an improved velocity model and station corrections. The technique used is discussed below. We present map views and cross sections of the improved solutions. For comparison, two sets of plots are available; the highest quality solutions, and a broader selection of good-quality solutions.

Even after careful relocation, no obvious single fault plane can be discerned. Several features of the earthquake cluster can be noted. The earthquakes are grouped in a very narrow depth range, from 8 to 10 km. In map view, the cluster is elongated in the NW-SE direction, with the mainshock closer to the southeast end. In comparing the locations of the very be st-located earthquakes (AA quality) to a broader selection (BB and better quality), the AA quality solutions cluster in an even narrower depth range, but have a similar distribution in map view.


Best Improved Locations: Solution Quality AA, 144 events between May 2 and June 24, 1996

  • Map view of relocated events: Mainshock and aftershocks
  • Cross-Section view from north; east to left, west to right
  • Cross-Section view from N30E; southeast to left, northwest to right
  • Cross-Section view from N60E; southeast to left, northwest to right
  • Cross-Section view from N90E; south to left, north to right
  • Cross-Section view from N120E; southwest to left, northeast to right
  • Cross-Section view from N150E; southwest to left, northeast to right

    For comparison: Improved Locations, Solution Quality BB and better, 311 events between May 2 and June 24, 1996

  • Map view of relocated events: Mainshock and aftershocks
  • Cross-Section view from north; east to left, west to right
  • Cross-Section view from N30E; southeast to left, northwest to right
  • Cross-Section view from N60E; southeast to left, northwest to right
  • Cross-Section view from N90E; south to left, north to right
  • Cross-Section view from N120E; southwest to left, northeast to right
  • Cross-Section view from N150E; southwest to left, northeast to right

    Results

    Even after careful relocation, no obvious single fault plane can be discerned. Several features of the earthquake cluster can be noted. The earthquakes are grouped in a very narrow depth range, from 8 to 10 km. In map view, the cluster is elongated in the NW-SE direction, with the mainshock closer to the southeast end. In comparing the locations of the very best-located earthquakes (AA quality) to a broader selection (BB and better quality), the AA quality solutions cluster in an even narrower depth range, but have a similar distribution in map view.

    Summary of Method used to improve locations

    The mainshock and aftershocks were relocated using a master-event technique to improve the precision of locations and depth estimates. A set of 27 well-located earthquakes with readings from close-in USGS temporary stations within 1 or 2 km of the epicentral locations was used to determine station corrections.

    Step 1: A subset of 10 stations with good azimuthal coverage and reading quality was selected, for which 6 of the well-located events had "good" readings on all ten stations (i.e. residuals low enough that the reading was used in the solution). The six events were relocated using the CO (Cascade) velocity model, and P readings from the ten stations which were common to all six master events. The azimuthal gaps (after relocation) ranged from 68-78 degrees. and the nearest station was within 1 km for all six of the master events. Magnitudes of master events ranged form 2.5-3.2.

    Stations used: CHC, HTW, BHW, TTW, RMW, JCW, BLN, FMW, SMW, CKA).
    Events used: 96050314153p, 96050316021p, 96050316070p, 96050412163p, 96050419574p, 96050507253p. Six events were chosen

    Step 2: The average residual determined for each of the 10 stations from Step 1 was set as the station correction, and the full set of 27 events with close-in readings was relocated using P waves only, and the station set of 10 stations with newly-determined station corrections. The locations were then fixed, and another location run performed to compute average station residuals for additional stations. An expanded station set (sta.CE) and an improved version of the Cascade velocity model (vel.CE) was formulated by adding station corrections for stations on which at least 10 P-wave readings were available from among the set of 27, and for which the standard deviation between the residuals was .1 seconds or less.

    Corrections were determined for additional stations: GSM, RPW, HDW, XTL, QTZ, TWW, CMK, RER, MBW, LO2, ELL, WAT, CKA, GRL, TBM, MUP, WPW, CBS, MCW.

    Step 3: The revised set of stations (sta.CE) and velocity model (vel.CE) were used to relocate all events in the map area shown. Events of location quality "BB" or better are shown in the map view and cross sections. In cross-sections, topography is displayed with vertically exaggerated by a factor of 3.